All girls are crazy, amirite?!

Tags

, , ,

ImageWho is the perfect girlfriend?

If you’re a misogynist who wants a live in house-keeper and sex-slave rather than an equal, your list would likely include:

  • Cooks and cleans (so I never have to lift a finger and she can replace my mother)
  • Daily blowjobs (but never reciprocating because her pleasure is not important)
  • Always in the mood for sex (exactly how I like it, no turning her on necessary)
  • Never nags (because expecting me to do anything helpful, keep my word or act like an adult is unreasonable)
  • Perfect body, perfect face (but I can look however I want)
  • Always sweet and demure (never gets angry or fights back when I treat her like shit)
  • Doesn’t diet (drinks beer, eats burgers, but is never allowed to gain weight)
  • Is one of the boys (likes sports and other things I enjoy because “girly” interests hold no value and I don’t want her to have her own life outside of me) 
  • Isn’t clingy (I only see her on my terms, not considering her wants and needs, and really only when I want something)
  • Isn’t jealous (doesn’t complain when I flirt with / touch / send sexual messages to other girls and just acts cool with it)
  • Doesn’t talk a lot (I have no interest in anything you think or feel and just tune out)

Okay so I haven’t met many people who expect or want their girlfriends to tick all those sexist boxes. But when expressions like “crazy ex” and “don’t put your dick in crazy” and “stage five clinger” are bandied about, it certainly feels like there is a lot of pressure to be laidback, cool, and almost disinterested when it comes to relationships. Women are often expected to hide their feelings, because if they let them show then they risk being accused of being “psycho”, “needy”, “whiny”, “nagging” or “crazy”.

I’ve definitely felt the pressure not to be jealous in past relationships. “Oh that attractive girl who I know has a crush on you is giving you massages and sitting on your lap? Yeah, I’m totally cool with that, why wouldn’t I be? I trust you.”

Trust is sometimes thrown back in our faces if we admit we’re jealous: “If you really trusted me then I should be able to flirt with other people and have female friends sleep in my bed and have play fights with girls who have expressed interest in me and let them cuddle me. You know I won’t cheat on you, so everything I do should be fine.” If you complain your feelings are treated as though they are wrong and that it is you that needs to change your behaviour.

Note: Your feelings are never wrong. Your partner may not understand them, or agree with the reasons behind them, but you are perfectly entitled to have them. It is how you go about expressing these feelings that are important.

Concerns need to be discussed so that a middle ground can be met and boundaries can be made.

There have certainly been times where I’ve tried to avoid doing anything that I know a guy might use as ammo to call me crazy. I’ll wait for him to text me first. If he doesn’t seem interested in texting me I won’t push it. If I am jealous of his female friends, I won’t bring it up and act like I’m not jealous at all. If I’m feeling insecure about my body I won’t bring it up. If I wish he’d spend more time with me I won’t bring it up. If small things he does is really bugging me I won’t bring it up.

Why was I going out of my way to hide any negative feelings I had? Why was I so worried about being the perfect girlfriend?

A lot of it is learning from past mistakes.

After being dumped by a guy I loved in high school, I was a mess, because we were on different pages. He was ready to move on and, obviously, I wasn’t. It was very difficult for me to go from being in a relationship to being friends. He got with someone else three days after breaking up with me. It was all over his Bebo page (yes, back in the days of Bebo!) – his friends mentioning her, saying how cute they were. It was as if I went from being the most important person in someone’s life, to being nobody. I loved someone who didn’t love me back. Anyone who has been there knows how much that sucks.

So now, I’ve learnt that you simply cannot stay friends. You need a break. You need to move on and this won’t happen if you’re being “friends” and they’re out getting with other people. Don’t see them, call them, text them, email them, or look at their Facebook.

But back then, I didn’t filter my emotions. I told him every thought that was in my head about it. I told him I was upset. I told him I was hurt. I told him I couldn’t believe he’d moved on so quickly and how it was insulting that he’d prefer someone stupid like her to me – how shit must I be if you’d prefer her? This is such a blow to my delicate self-esteem! Bleh.

I was being honest. Naturally, this all came across as bitter and pathetic and some of it definitely was. But nobody teaches you how to act when you’re heartbroken for the first time. Nobody says, “Don’t say that, you’re going to annoy him and you’re not doing yourself any favours.” I cringe when I look back on all the things I said and wish I could take it back.

Later, we got to a point where I had moved on and we were talking again. He mentioned in passing something about his friends referring to me as the “crazy ex”.

This really stung. I wasn’t crazy. I was perfectly sane. The relationship itself was healthy and normal and laidback and fun. I didn’t stop him seeing his friends and I tried to get along with his female friends. I didn’t demand things from him that he didn’t want to give or make him spend more time with me than he wanted to. Any problems we had we talked about them maturely. I didn’t have mood swings. We didn’t have screaming matches. Our fights were few, silly and over quickly. Sure, I wasn’t as mature as I am now, but I was trying my best.

It seemed like every good thing about me was erased and all boiled down to a stereotype. My emotions weren’t valid – they were used to make me seem nuts. I wasn’t a heartbroken teen trying to deal with losing love for the first time and unsure how to cope; I was crazy. I had shown my emotions as they came to me; I was crazy.

Why is it that some guys are so quick to label a woman as crazy?

I think a lot of it is simply not wanting to deal with someone else’s emotions. Instead of trying to understand, reassure, or talk it out, they’re baffled that it’s happening in the first place. Part of it is confirmation bias: You’ve been told all your life that girls are crazy drama queens. You’ve seen it in the movies. You’ve heard your friends talk about their crazy exes. And here is your girlfriend yelling at you for not texting her all day– she’s just proving that it’s true! They are crazy! It’s easy to roll your eyes and not take any responsibility for another person’s emotions and reactions if you’ve been raised to expect them and put them down for it.

Can a woman overreact? Sure. So can a man. But remember that not everybody will view things the same way, and just because something doesn’t bother you, doesn’t mean everybody else has to be okay with it too. What might seem like an over-reaction to you could be seen as completely normal and justified to another. You might have no problem with leaving dishes all over the place, but it doesn’t mean everybody else is crazy for not liking it.

When it comes to arguments, what might seem like a blow-up over nothing could have been slowly building up for a long, long time, small thing on top of small thing grinding away and suddenly you’re being screamed at just for not changing the toilet roll!

The solution is, as always, communication. And that involves listening and trying to understand where they’re coming from. Don’t accuse someone of “nagging”. Ask (in a non-accusatory, non-confrontational tone) what you can do to make things better and why they feel the way they do. Don’t stereotype. Don’t assume. Calmly talk it out. And if you can’t, take a breather and have some space from each other. If only I’d done this five years ago instead of letting everything out when I was feeling upset!

Being the perfect partner (regardless of gender) isn’t possible. The old adage is true: nobody’s perfect. But being a great partner isn’t about never showing emotions and always being laidback – it’s about talking things out before it gets to boiling point, and listening and trying to understand each other’s point of view. It’s about not labelling the other person, or using their actions to stereotype them. It’s about setting boundaries, being firm with them, and if the other person keeps trying to cross them knowing they’re not the person for you. It’s knowing when to say something and when to let it go. It’s having respect for each other’s feelings. It’s wanting to make each other happy, not expecting them to simply be there to make you happy. It’s being good friends who have sex, basically.

Don’t feel pressured to pretend you’re totally cool with everything that happens in life and relationships. Your opinions and feelings are important and valid as long as they’re handled maturely. If you’re with someone who makes you feel worse when you feel bad, ditch them. Life is too short to devote a lot of time to someone who calls you crazy.

Unless you’re currently reading this from within a strait-jacket in a very soft-walled room, in which case you probably have some issues you need to work out before getting into a relationship. Ha! 

“It’s just Facebook”

“It’s just Facebook, it doesn’t mean anything.”

I hate when people say this.

When I was in my first year of university and living in a hostel with mainly strangers, I was, I now see, suffering from social anxiety. Not so bad that I couldn’t function in society, but it meant that I made very few friends that year and was nervous a lot. My head bombarded me with negative thoughts constantly, especially assumptions about how others perceived me. I cared far too much what other people thought. If I said “hey” to someone in a friendly tone, and they didn’t sound friendly when they said hi back, I instantly thought they didn’t like me and felt uncomfortable around them thereafter. I was too nervous to approach anyone; even people I’d already spoken to many times before. I’d spend ages working up the courage to approach them and worrying that they didn’t like me or that I was going to say something wrong. I never really felt like I fit in. People would show up in other people’s rooms unexpectedly to say hi and hang out, and when I did this I always got the vibe (whether imagined or not) that I was annoying them. I spent a lot of time in my room with the door closed. In my hostel end of year book, in the section on me, the person who filled it out wrote “who?” next to “Nickname.” Ouch. Although someone also wrote “sweetness” in the “Known For” bit which was nice.

At the start of that year I realised I was living on the same floor as a guy I knew from my home city. I told him on the first day in the hostel that I was too shy to approach people and was relying on him to introduce us to people, and then once that was over with I would chat away happily. I doubt many people would think I was shy at all once I got talking – I’m very bubbly and chatty. But it was that initial contact that terrified me.

Anyway, this guy was like a safe haven for me. He already knew me, we got along, and though he probably didn’t know how I felt, he was very helpful at making me feel less lonely. I’d hang out in his room a lot and just chat. We were both in long distance relationships at the time (probably another reason I didn’t make many friends – I was travelling home most weekends) and so it was nice to have someone to relate to with that.

I felt like he was a good friend, and though we sort of lost touch after that first year, we were Facebook friends, and when I saw him in the street we’d stop and hug and chat.

However, sometime last year I thought to tell him something and went onto his Facebook page to chat to him, only to realise he’d deleted me as a friend. Or had he? I thought maybe I was remembering things wrong and we’d never been Facebook friends in the first place. So I added him again. He never added me back. “Okay,” I thought, “Maybe he just doesn’t go on Facebook”. But then I saw he hadn’t altered his privacy settings and I could see all his updates. He’d been using Facebook a lot, had seen my friend request, and declined it.

Why did this hurt my feelings so much? When I saw this, I thought a whole bunch of things: Have I done something to make him not like me? Has someone said something negative about me to him? Was it a one-sided friendship all along and did he not actually like me at all? Had I imagined that we were friends and he secretly thought otherwise?

The thing is a lot of people would say that who you are friends with on Facebook is meaningless. Perhaps for some people it is. But while having someone as a Facebook friend doesn’t necessarily mean you’re friends with them in real life, un-friending someone, or not accepting their friend request, is deliberately showing that you are not interested in having that person talking to you or seeing what’s going on in your life. It’s basically a way of saying “I’m not interested in knowing you.”

There are some exceptions, sure, where you might not accept a request of your boss or grandparent because, while you like them in real life, you don’t want them seeing all your drunken photos and watching you swear like a sailor in your updates. But I know for me personally, I will only deny a friend request if I a) dislike someone or find them annoying and b) barely know them. Friends from primary school who I haven’t seen since then? Sure, why not! Friend of my sister who I’ve met once but never spoken to and will probably never see again? No.

A friend and I were discussing this, and we both agreed that to us personally, we’d only delete someone as a friend if we genuinely didn’t think they’d care or be offended. I could probably safely unfriend some of the people I went to primary school with, who I was barely friends with then, and who I never see now. They probably wouldn’t even notice. But someone who I was once really close friends with and spent a lot of time with in high school might be upset to know that I’ve decided I don’t want to know them anymore.

And that’s what it is. It’s actively deciding that this person isn’t worth having around, even online. If you really see your Facebook friends list as meaningless, unimportant, and nothing to do with the real world, then why do you find it necessary to still pick and choose who you want on it, unfriending who you don’t? People don’t just arbitrarily delete friends at random; they do it for a reason.

Yes, people drift apart and are no longer close friends. I have people on my friends list who I was very close with in high school, and who I no longer hang out with now. Time and distance has meant we haven’t kept in touch. Sometimes when you go a long time without seeing someone, it feels forced to keep trying to make it work and keep in touch. But this doesn’t mean I never want to speak to them again, or have no interest in their life. If I saw them in the street I’d say hi and ask how they’re going. While I’m not going to ask them to hang out, I still remember our friendship fondly and think well of them.

Perhaps because this is how I think of my Facebook friends, I find it hard to agree when people say “it’s just Facebook”. Facebook is huge. Just under half the population use it, a lot of whom use it daily. It is one of the ways we keep in touch, talk, and show each other what we’re up to. It is how we display our lives to each other.

People joke that relationships aren’t official until they’re “Facebook official”. Some roll their eyes at this. I’ve had ex-boyfriends say, “Why do we have to put it on Facebook? We’re together, that should be enough.” I’ve heard similar things from many different people. If you want to keep your private life private, that’s up to you. But I don’t think it’s unreasonable to want to show your Facebook friends that you are in a relationship. It means other people won’t mistakenly think you are single and hit on you. It means you aren’t ashamed to have people knowing who you are with. In my opinion, the people who piss and moan about the “need” to “show off” your relationship on Facebook have tended to be the ones who didn’t want to be in a relationship in the first place. If you’re not embarrassed to be in a relationship, what exactly is the harm in having it known to your Facebook friends? If someone wants to explain this one to me, please do.

Another form of unfriending is the “I’m angry and to prove how much I hate you I’m going to delete you – that’ll show you how little I care!” deleting.

Even I’ve been guilty of this one. To be fair, it probably did fall under the “if they probably won’t care that you’ve deleted them then it’s okay” umbrella. The end of my first year social anxiety story ends up with me finding a little group of stay-up-laters who all seemed to share my sense of humour and movie tastes. I hung out with most if not all of them, every day. Seemed like a happy ending! I sat with them for meals, had heart to hearts with some of them, and got drunk with them. After a while, I felt like I was part of the group.

Then came second year Uni. They all went flatting together, and I flatted 10 minutes away. The friendship got one-sided fast. I always visited them, they never visited me. If I wanted to see them, I had to go to them. Because they were all in the same building, their friendship was effortless – nobody needed to invite each other anywhere, they could just start drinking or watching a movie and everyone was already there. Everybody except me. Nobody thought to invite me. Nobody texted me to see how I was.

In third year Uni I was much better off. I shook the social anxiety and became very positive, confident and happy. I managed to genuinely stop caring what people thought. I realised that I had some friends who always made the effort to invite me over and texted me first. Friends who invited me to parties or just to hang out and who sincerely seemed to care how I was doing. It made me frustrated and hurt that I’d put so much time and energy into a one-sided friendship with people who didn’t seem to notice when I wasn’t around for months at a time. In a cathartic moment I deleted them off Facebook to signify the end of fake friendships, or something like that. I’ve run into them since then and they have been nothing but friendly to me so I kind of feel bad about the impulsive un-friend, but again, I doubt they really care.

Another time I kissed a guy in town, added him on Facebook, and we talked a little. We arranged to meet up in town again, and twice, when the time came, he didn’t reply or avoided me. So naturally I let that one go and deleted him on Facebook. I barely knew him, and I thought he was being a dick for standing me up instead of just saying he wasn’t interested, so I un-friended him. No point keeping people like that around. Funnily enough he texted me a few days ago at 3am, about a year later, saying sorry for being a dick. Wonder where that came from?

I think there’s a difference between unfriending someone because they aren’t in your life and/or you don’t want them to be, and the people who delete their friends every time they get mad at them, only to re-add them when they make up, then repeat cycle. I had a friend who would delete people all the time in this way, and I found it funny because she obviously thought they would care, when they all just rolled their eyes at her for being childish. So how do you draw the line? Can you ever feel justified in unfriending someone without being deemed childish? I guess if you use Facebook a lot, put up photos, tell people what you’ve got going on, it’s your choice who you feel comfortable knowing so much about you, and if you’re not friends with someone in real life, then you shouldn’t feel obligated to be their Facebook friend. I think that it becomes childish when you’re doing it all the time and often to people who are still very firmly planted in your life or friendship circle.

Okay this has become more diary-entry than blog and I apologise for that. I will try to summarise: It isn’t “just Facebook” and you know it. It isn’t just words on a screen. There is a person with thoughts and feelings on the other side of that screen, and while what they get upset about may not be what you get upset about, doesn’t mean their feelings are invalid. Just because those feelings are over a silly social media site, doesn’t make it okay to dismiss them. What we do online, particularly on Facebook, often reflects how we see the world, and others, in real life.

Oh and anyone who knew me in first year and hasn’t seen me since, I think I’m a pretty different person now. Definitely less anxious and awkward, less drunk when I drink, less eager to please, more likely to realise if I’m actually being annoying or intruding, and well… happier. More fun. If you’ve stuck with me on Facebook and are kind enough to read my ramblings, I’d love for you to say hi. And for that small group who have had two-sided friendships with me since first year, I love you to pieces.

When Yes doesn’t mean Yes

In health classes in school we were always taught that “no means no”. If you say no, and they force themselves on you anyway, then that is rape. Simple right? But it’s not that simple and often grey areas are simply ignored or not talked about.

Can it be rape if you’re saying yes?

Example one: A woman is having sex with her boyfriend who she loves, and it’s really hurting her badly. She is crying, she is uncomfortable, she is not showing any signs of enjoyment or participation… but she loves her boyfriend and wants to please him and so when he asks if he should continue she says yes, even though she means no. How can he continue when I’m crying and in pain? Why does he want to continue when I’m clearly not enjoying it? To this woman, emotionally, it feels like rape, but she won’t call it that because she said yes – she gave him permission – and besides, this is her boyfriend who she loves, he wouldn’t rape her, right?

People will have two views on this scenario. One camp will say “Why would he continue to have sex with her when she’s in pain – even though she’s said yes? Can he really be that blind to her body language? Can he really be so selfish as to ignore her tears and pain in order to get laid?”

The other will say, “If she was in pain, she shouldn’t have said yes, plain and simple.”

Example two: A woman is staying over at a guy’s house that she has consensually slept with several times before and who she really likes. She tells him she doesn’t want to sleep with him because she has a headache, she’s tired, and she’s not in the mood. He starts off trying to get her in the mood, kissing her neck, touching her chest, but she tells him to cut it out. He stops, they continue cuddling but five minutes later he’s giving it another go. She tells him to stop, he stops, then tries again in another five minutes. He repeats this several times and she grows more and more frustrated with him. Eventually he stops trying to get her in the mood and instead just asks for sex, over and over. She keeps saying no and saying she wants to sleep. He won’t stop bugging her and pleading with her. Oh yeah, pal, your desperate pleas for sex are so turning me on right now. She knows he won’t stop bugging her until she gives in so even though she doesn’t want to… she says yes and goes through the motions to “get it over with” so he’ll leave her alone. She feels used and upset, but it’s not rape right, because she said yes?

Two camps again. The first will say, “Pressuring someone and bugging someone to do something they don’t want to do until they give in and say yes to get you to leave them alone is wrong, plain and simple.”

The second will say, “She should have kept saying no or left the room – by saying yes she was allowing it to happen and it’s not rape.”

I don’t think either woman in these scenarios would call the guy a rapist because they have placed the blame squarely on their own shoulders: “I shouldn’t have said yes”.

Some women say yes when they want to be saying no for several reasons. They might be in shock and can’t bring themselves to say anything. They might be hoping that their partner will notice that they are lying there, upset, and will stop on their own. They might be really drunk. They might feel like they can’t say no to their boyfriend because they are in love with them. They might feel trapped, like there’s no way to stop the hassling and pressure but to give in. Whatever the reason, I don’t think it’s fair to place the entire burden and blame on the woman as some people often do. Those people in camp two who see it as black and white: “Well she should have said no” – why aren’t they saying, “That man shouldn’t have put her in that position where she needs to?”

Women, particularly young women, need to be taught to be more assertive and to walk away when they feel pressured. But more importantly, men need to be taught about the grey areas of consent. It’s different from person to person, but I would argue that a yes isn’t a yes if it isn’t enthusiastic. You know what someone who is interested in fucking you looks like: They are into it. Their body language shows this. They are pulling you towards them or telling you they want you, or initiating contact. Someone who is enthusiastically consenting is not lying there crying or in pain. Someone enthusiastically consenting doesn’t have to be begged for sex, or pressured into it. They aren’t so drunk they’re basically asleep.

Here’s where more grey areas come in: Sometimes, in normal, healthy relationships, one partner or the other has sex when they’re not really in the mood, because they want to please their partner and feel like sex is an important part of the relationship. “Sure”, they think, “I’m not really in the mood, but I’ll try my best to do it anyway”. This is different. This is not someone being hassled or bugged into sex; this is someone making the decision to have sex despite not being really in the mood themselves. This is someone happily choosing to do something to please their partner because they want to make them happy too, not someone who feels obligated to do it, or is miserable about doing it.

Something I want to be more strongly emphasised in sex education in schools is this: Just because he is your boyfriend (or she is your girlfriend) doesn’t mean they take ownership of your body. Being in a relationship with someone doesn’t mean they get to use your body however they want, whenever they want. Just because you have slept with someone before, doesn’t mean you are obligated to sleep with them again – even if you are in a relationship. Even if you are in love. Even if you’ve never said no to them before. Even if you’ve slept with a lot of people before them.

And in reverse: Just because you are in a relationship with someone, doesn’t mean they are always consenting and willing to have sex with you. Just because they have said yes before, doesn’t mean it’s always a yes. Just because they have done something with an ex, doesn’t mean they are obligated to do it with you. Gentle persuasion is fine if you’ve slept with them before and respect each other’s boundaries – there’s nothing wrong with trying to get your partner in the mood – but you have to read the signals. You should be able to tell if it’s a “Not now, no, get away from me” or an “Hmm I wasn’t in the mood before but now…” and if you can’t tell, or aren’t that great at reading body language then ask. A simple, “is this okay?” will do. Better to feel a bit awkward asking than to risk doing something that someone isn’t into and having them too scared or awkward to say no. And if they’re just lying there looking upset / bored take the hint. Do you really want to fuck someone who isn’t wanting to fuck you? Think about that before you put the pressure on.

Here’s where a few guys, in my experience, have pulled the slut line. A direct quote from a former male friend:

“other girls ruin it for u if u believe that…which is fine to believe but the sluts who are like hmmm na actually theyre right, i do want sex ruin it for the other girls coz we generalize girls like oh she changed her mind after, why wont the other girl?”

Hey, how about the obvious:Because all women aren’t the same? Because maybe the “sluts” you’re comparing girls to a) were also pressured into saying yes or b) started off not being in the mood then became in the mood. Not so hard to grasp. Women aren’t always in the mood. There is often a point where you go from “no thanks” to “okay you’ve turned me on, let’s do this.” This doesn’t mean they were saying no to be a tease, or that all women will eventually be in the mood if you pester them enough. That makes no sense!

This guy deleted me from Facebook after this “hey, maybe don’t pressure girls into sex any more” conversation… so I doubt he’s taken this on board, but if you’re reading… come on dude, I’m not the bad guy here.

I also must add that though I’m mainly mentioning males as the pressuring force, it can obviously go both ways and there are also men out there who have felt pressured into sex and that’s not cool either! Unfortunately people often buy into stereotypes that guys are always sex hungry and why would they possibly not want to do it? This is not only false but also the idea that all men are controlled by their penises above all else is a dangerous idea to perpetuate for both genders sake. It leaves women who are turned down by their boyfriends wondering what’s up and men feeling like if they aren’t having (or wanting) a lot of sex there’s something wrong with them.

Boys and girls, the key is communication. If everyone can be as clear as possible about what they want and don’t want then navigating the grey areas of consent will be easier for everyone. And obviously, if someone’s telling you to back off – listen! Assume everyone means what they are saying!

Keep safe everyone!

I want that chubby Communist girl off my show!

Tags

, , , , ,

                   

I am overweight.

There, I said it.

My BMI says it. And before you say that a BMI isn’t an accurate measure because it doesn’t take into account muscle weight… I’m almost entirely sure most of my body weight is fat because I am in no way muscular and can’t even remember the last time I exercised.

I have a gut on me that sticks out over the top of my jeans… which are a size 14 by the way. I wear almost exclusively dresses (some size 10, mostly size 12), in particular ones that are fitted in the chest and flow out with no clinging. For a t-shirt to be big enough not to cling to my stomach it ends up way too big everywhere else, so I don’t wear t-shirts. I think I’m pretty good at dressing for my shape.

I’m overweight and it’s my own fault, nobody else’s. I’m lazy. I like food. I have a sweet tooth. I snack when I’m bored. I eat chocolate when I’m feeling down.

I know all this about myself and that’s okay.

The thing is, I’m at kind of an in-between weight. I don’t think someone trying to describe me to someone else would say “Anna’s fat.” They might say chubby or curvy or mention my boobs, but fat? Surely not. I still get hit on in bars by guys I find attractive so that must mean something right? Nobody thinks I’m fat right? But the sad thing is, when I think about this possibility, I really hope nobody would describe me as fat.

But why?

When I was in a musical recently, I was doing pretty well. Lots of great compliments on my voice from other cast members, the director, musical director and vocal coach. I put my all into it and felt confident doing it.

Then talk came of the next musical coming up – Hairspray! And lo and behold I get a bunch of people in the show telling me I’d be great for the lead. Tracy Turnblad. The Fat Girl.

I was upset.

It should have been a compliment, having people think I have the vocal talent to sing all Tracy’s songs and dance all her dances. Tracy is a kickass character in a high energy musical with a lot of really cool songs. She doesn’t let her body size get in the way of going after her dreams and she’s always happy, bubbly, and doesn’t judge others. I should be proud to play her.

But whenever anybody told me I just had to audition for Tracy all I heard was “You’re fat. You are fat enough to play the part of the fat girl in the fat musical.” It especially stung because not a single person said “Obviously you’d need to wear a fat suit.” Or “You’d be great as Tracy if they padded your costumes”.

All it made me think was “Wow. All these people think I’m fat. Time to lose some weight!”

Who knows if this is true, but who cares? What exactly is so terrifying about being considered fat?

A lot of it is the word fat. Sure you can call me curvy, voluptuous, and even chubby – but fat? No way. Society has told us all our lives that fat is bad and shitty people have treated fat people badly. A Tui billboard read “I’ll take the fat chick – yeah right!” Even though not everyone has this mind-set, it’s still prevalent enough to make some fat people, especially women, feel self-hatred and desperately want to change. I know I’ve thought a few times “My life will be better when I lose some weight.” Why am I thinking that when I have an awesome life as it is? I won’t go into the whole “media ideals of beauty are unrealistic and unfair” rant because you’ve heard it all before…

But if you think about it, you’ve probably all met one fat person who is unpleasant. They’re grumpy all the time, they seem miserable; they assume if you’re being nice to them you have ill-intent. They assume that if they’re being hit on it’s for a dare. They’re angry when their thinner friends get hit on, and yet respond coldly if someone approaches them. They’ve let being overweight change their demeanour. Years of snide remarks and being picked on has left them assuming the worst in everyone and hating their body. This makes me pretty sad. And it’s all because of fat-shamers. The ones who point and laugh. The ones who make jokes. The ones who act repulsed if a fat person talks to them because they’re desperate to let that person, and everyone else around, know that fat people don’t have a chance in hell with them and they’re offended by the idea that anyone would think so.

So a message for the fat-shamers out there: What does someone else’s weight have to do with you? It isn’t your body; you don’t get a say.

Yes, there are health issues associated with being overweight but frankly, that has nothing to do with anyone else. Somebody’s weight is nobody’s business but their own and their doctors. Yet some people act like it’s a personal insult to themselves to see a fat person. How dare they be there, looking like that, right in front of me! How gross! How dare they wear something tight fitting, showing off how disgustingly fat they are! How dare they eat a burger rather than a salad! Why don’t they go for a walk? Fat people are all lazy and unhealthy!

The truth is fat people are fat for all kinds of reasons. Sometimes it’s health (even mental health), sometimes it’s a lack of motivation but sometimes, maybe sometimes they just don’t give a shit what you think and don’t feel like their body is here for anyone else’s benefit and viewing pleasure. Sometimes maybe they enjoy life more just chilling out eating whatever they want, whenever they want. Maybe they’re exercising and eating all the right foods and still aren’t losing weight. Maybe they like their body when it’s got more meat on it. Maybe it doesn’t matter.

My body is mine. It’s just what I live in. Fat doesn’t define me. It’s simply my body type right now. It’s a lot of people’s body type right now. Fat or thin, I’m still the same person with the same interests, intellect, sense of humour etc.

Yet I don’t like going to the beach because, God forbid, someone might see my chubs. What the hell is that even about? Why does it matter what anyone else thinks? It is literally just enjoying the sunshine, hanging out and going for a swim – you can do that no matter what size you are… so why is it such a stigma for fat people? Why do people worry that they will be made fun of?

Sometimes people’s reactions to other people’s bodies can be depressing though. When I used to go out to clubs with my friends, we would almost always get hit on in order of our clothing size. The thinner friends get talked to first. The bigger girls get ignored. At first this annoyed the plus sized ones. We’d sit around saying “We’re much nicer than her! We’re just as fun as her! It’s not fair that guys automatically go for her over us!”

But you know what, while I don’t think it’s necessarily fair that people might rather get to know a mean person who is thin than a nice person who is fat, I also think it’s not fair to be annoyed at someone for who they happen to be attracted to.

I’ve heard formerly fat people complain that people don’t hit on them when they’re overweight, but do once they’ve lost weight. I think if it’s the same person then yes, they should know better than to be so obvious as to shun the fat-you then hit on you when you’ve lost weight. That’s rude.

But I also feel like we all need to stop blaming other people for who they happen to be attracted to which they can’t help!

Yes, if someone blatantly ignores you when seated next to you at a dinner, or talks to all your friends and ignores you – that is definitely rude. Just because you’re not attracted to someone doesn’t mean it’s okay to exclude them. But I don’t think it’s fair to be annoyed at people for not hitting on you or wanting to date you.

Yes, in an ideal world everyone would look past appearances and get to know your personality and then date you no matter what you look like – and there will be many amazing people who will do just that. But there will also be a lot of people who aren’t attracted to you; perhaps they don’t find fat people attractive. Perhaps they do, but not as much as thinner girls. They can’t help that. I know I personally am attracted to skinny white guys almost exclusively. I would never ignore someone or not bother to get to know them just because I’m not attracted to them, but I also know it’s unlikely I’m going to end up kissing them if there is no spark, no attraction.

I just think we need to be realistic. It sucks that skinnier people get hit on more, but people can’t help that they happen to be more physically / sexually attracted to some body types than others. You could be missing out on someone very nice, but you could also be missing out on a judgmental, image-obsessed asshole who literally hates fat people and won’t even get to know them as a friend. PS: a certain male I was seeing once said he doesn’t like fat people. Seeing that pretty much all of my relatives on both sides of the family are overweight and all awesome, intelligent, hilarious people… this pissed me off. How can you just write someone off because of their weight? How does what their body look like negate all the wonderful things they have to offer? Shit’s sad. Good luck to the woman he marries if she ever becomes overweight! But I’m rambling…

So now the hard part: I know that when I am no longer overweight, more people will likely be attracted to me. Do I go for those people? Do I say “fuck it”, stay the weight I am and hope I find someone who digs it, or do I lose weight to increase the amount of people who will be attracted to me? Losing weight for the benefit of anyone but me isn’t cool… but being single (pretty much) for five years is getting old too. Dilemma!

If you want to only go for people who are attracted to you at any weight – that’s cool, you’ll probably end up with an amazing person. But there are probably just as many amazing people out there who you’re missing out on by being mad at them for not being attracted to fat people.

I think what it comes down to is whether or not you are happy with yourself. I don’t hate my body but there are parts I’d like to change. I’d like to be fitter. I’d like to wear t-shirts and slimmer fitting dresses. I’d like to see my arms in photos and not wish they were hidden. None of these things make me unhappy and none of them make me dislike myself or lose confidence – they’re just minor inconveniences in an otherwise awesome life. Perhaps that’s because I’m in the in-between weight, or perhaps that’s because I’ve gotten to a point in my life where I genuinely don’t care what other people think of me that I feel this way, but either way, there really are only positives to getting healthy, so it’s time to do it!

What I’d like to see is a world where fat is nothing but an adjective used to describe a body type. Where people can say they’re fat without it being a bad thing.

What do you do when a friend who is fat, says they’re fat? It’s just a fact. Yet it’s so hard to find the right words to say. “Yes. Yes you are fat. You’re fat and you’re awesome.” Not “BUT you’re awesome.” That’s what I’d like to say, but we’ve been taught our whole lives that fat is a bad thing. If a friend says they’re fat, the instant response is to say “No you’re not! You’re not fat!” But all that does is reinforce the idea that fat is bad. They know they’re fat, you know they’re fat, yet somehow acknowledging it is like saying there’s something really bad and wrong with them like they’re contagious. Like we have to pretend everyone is skinny. That’s just silly kids.

So to all the fat-shamers out there, just let this sink in: Sometimes people are fat. This does not change who they are as a person. This does not mean they should have to cover up to appease you. If they want to wear short shorts and get their tits (or man-tits) out, all the power to them. This does not necessarily mean they are lazy and even if they are – laziness doesn’t negate all the good qualities they have to bring to the table! You don’t have to be attracted to all people, that is your right, but you do have to be respectful of others no matter what their size. Fat-shaming is bad. It’s mean. It’s useless. Calling someone fat won’t make them say “Woah am I? Shit, you’re right, guess I better go on a diet.” No, it’ll just make them hate you and maybe even hate themselves.

Summer’s coming. Fat bottom girls, it’s yours to enjoy just as much as anyone else!

Why we should ask a Woman her age on her Birthday

Tags

, , ,

Last night we were celebrating someone’s birthday at my show rehearsal and I asked her how old she was. She said, “You never ask a woman over thirty her age!” I jokingly replied, “I didn’t realise you were over thirty!” (It’s true, she has lovely skin and looks younger than she is) but then I added on a serious note, “Why does it matter? Age is just a number.”

I don’t blame her for saying it; she’s probably heard it plenty of times herself. Sometimes we pass on these old adages without even thinking about what effect they have and how detrimental they really are.

When it’s considered offensive to ask a woman’s age on her birthday we are perpetuating the idea that only youth is beautiful, youth is valuable, and the older we get the less we have to offer the world. If this is true, how bleak the future must seem for women everywhere. It makes it seem as though aging is abnormal and so must be hidden behind makeup, anti-wrinkle creams and perhaps cosmetic surgery or Botox… although only if you’re a woman. Society doesn’t tell men to be ashamed of their age or to try and hide it nearly as often as it does for women (although the shaming of age is definitely there for men too – see all the anti-hair-loss ads they’re faced with). Men are more often seen as becoming more “distinguished” with age. They’re less likely to dye their hair or use anti-wrinkle creams because they aren’t raised to believe that aging is a bad thing and that the older we get the more we should be worried.

We as women need to turn around this way of thinking ourselves and not be sucked in by the media’s youth obsession. We should look at the lines on a woman’s face like roadmaps showing the many paths a woman has been down to get her where she is today, not as something to erase. As you get older your body changes, your skin changes, your hair changes, and this happens to every single person in the world and always has done, so why are we fighting it?

Women are “finding themselves” at later and later ages and doing amazing things. Mothers whose children have moved out of home are going back to study or travelling the world. Women who have worked in one field for years are packing up and trying something new. As technology develops, older women are embracing it and using it to get their thoughts and ideas heard. There is so much to see and do and experience and age is no longer a hindrance, in fact, it can be freeing.

I was wrong to say that age is just a number; it’s much more than that. It is proof we’ve lived, had a ton of experiences, and survived and will continue to do so in an ever-changing world.

Don’t let anyone make you feel ashamed about your age because you aren’t worth any less because of it. If we can all take clichés like “don’t ask a woman her age” out of our vocabularies the future will be a better place for women. Let’s be kind to one another.

Why I Don’t Hate Kim Kardashian

Tags

, , , ,

There is a lot of hate for Kim Kardashian and her family. Even Jon Hamm, star of the wonderful show Mad Men, said, “Whether it’s Paris Hilton or Kim Kardashian or whoever, stupidity is certainly celebrated. Being a fucking idiot is a valuable commodity in this culture because you’re rewarded significantly.”

I think what he was getting at is a dislike for the reality TV genre and how you can get rich and famous without really doing anything or knowing anything. A lot of people hate what they see as pointless: Why would anyone want to watch a bunch of rich people with nice cars and fancy clothes going around travelling, partying, and dating other rich good looking people? But the fact of the matter is people do want to see this. It seems like there always has been, and always will be a fascination with those who are “living the dream”. Those select few beautiful, wealthy people who have enough money to do whatever they want. Look at how crazy people went over the royal wedding.  It’s why there are so many shows like Gossip Girl and the OC… the Kardashians are a real life version. People love to fantasise about what they’d buy and where they’d go if they won lotto, and here are people who won both the genetic lottery and were born into wealth, with cameras following them around so everyone gets a chance to see what it is like to live a life they themselves will likely never be a part of. It’s a life of privilege, where an entire family get to be models and have advertising deals when if they’d tried to do it alone from a more “normal” family they probably would have been another of the many failed attempts.

Then there are those who say that Kim is “only famous because of a sex tape”. People make private sex tapes all the time and it’s their own personal decision that we have no right to judge them for. Whether Kim’s tape’s release was intentional or not is up to speculation, but if Kim is telling the truth about it being leaked (and taking someone to court over it kind of implies this) then shouldn’t we feel sorry for her? She was taken advantage of by someone she trusts and had one of her most private moments put out there for the entire world to see.

Critics decry that you can be stupid and still be successful. But I don’t think Kim Kardashian is stupid. Sure she’s not an intellectual, but she turned a bad thing into a huge money making venture. While the “work” she does would not be considered work to the rest of us, she still has to be on her game constantly to keep the money rolling in. She has to put a ridiculous amount of effort into her appearance as that is what sells. She has to give up all privacy. She can’t ever be “normal” again. She has to be the butt of every “stupid” joke and called a slut all the time. Just because her life isn’t necessarily what you’d choose for yourself, doesn’t mean she should be hated. Not everyone is interested in what you are. She happens to be interested in fashion, beauty and modelling. A lot of people are and an equal amount of people judge them for it. Why can’t we just accept that people like different things to us, and let people do what they want? What’s so bad about liking these things anyway? It just ties in to the idea that women should be “naturally” beautiful and not have to work for it. Yet another standard thrown upon us.

I get the feeling a lot of people who judge Kim Kardashian haven’t actually watched the show. As someone who has, I know not to read too much into it or take it too seriously. It’s not meant to be insightful. I’m not meant to learn anything. It’s designed to be mindless entertainment. I like it because it makes me laugh. The sisters (particularly Khloe) have a really inappropriate sense of humour and make a lot of sexual innuendo jokes which I like. Despite appearance they aren’t too prissy and like to beat each other up and drag each other across the room while dogs chase them. They have sibling quarrels and seem like they have a pretty normal family dynamic underneath the wealth – they remind me of my own family at times. They’re also pretty introspective. In one episode Kim and Khloe were looking at old photos of themselves and reminiscing of the days when they had privacy and “didn’t try so hard. We try way too hard now.” At least they aren’t in denial about it!

As for Kim herself, although she seems a bit high maintenance at times (she’s an extreme neat freak and often overreacts to things like losing a favourite earring or being near a spider) she has never come across as anything other than nice on the show. She doesn’t make scathing comments about others, she isn’t rude to people, and when strangers verbally attack her in public she doesn’t fight back except to ask why they are attacking her when she has done nothing to them.

As for the 72 day wedding, of course people can find that ridiculous. Most of the people we know are in a relationship for years before marrying and it tends to last longer than that. When we see someone married for so short a time it seems crazy and we assume it’s a publicity stunt. Whether it is or not, what Kim does is her decision, not anyone else’s and she cannot be expected to please everyone in the world. That’s the problem with being in the public eye, people expect things of you, hold you up high, and hate you when you fall. I guess what I’m saying is – it’s not your life, so you can’t make any assumptions or expectations on how she should live it.

I guess what I’m getting at is that it seems silly to waste any time or energy “hating” Kim Kardashian, when she as a person isn’t abhorrent. Instead hate that the world has come to a point where the lucky few like Kim can make a lot of money out of showing their lives to the world, and that there are so many people willing to watch this. She’s simply filling a position that people wanted filled and is a product of the society she grew up in. Is now an appropriate time to say “don’t hate the player; hate the game”?

http://khloekardashian.celebuzz.com/wall-street-journal-interview-06-2012

Why should a 70 year old pay for a young woman to be a slut?

Tags

, , , , , ,

If you haven’t heard about Rush Limbaugh calling Sandra Fluke a slut, I suggest you Google it. Basically there was a hearing in Georgetown, USA about government funding for oral contraceptive pills in which a student named Sandra Fluke was denied speaking (making it an all-male panel talking about women’s contraceptives) but was later allowed to have her say. Republican radio host Rush Limbaugh then said, “What does it say about the college co-ed Susan Fluke, who goes before a congressional committee and essentially says that she must be paid to have sex, what does that make her? It makes her a slut, right? It makes her a prostitute. She wants to be paid to have sex. She’s having so much sex she can’t afford the contraception. She wants you and me and the taxpayers to pay her to have sex”

Obviously this is ridiculous. It is not just young women who use contraceptives. People in relationships go on the pill. Married couples use them. People go on the pill to help with a whole range of medical issues that aren’t related to birth control. Limbaugh faced a lot of backlash for it, and many of his advertisers pulled their ads and stopped supporting him.

I was pretty disgusted when all of this happened, and didn’t think anything remotely similar would happen in New Zealand, but then along comes Colin Craig, leader of the Conservative party.

When Social Development Minister Paula Bennett announced free long-term contraception would be offered to women on benefits as part of a $287.5 million Budget package for the Government’s welfare reforms, naturally this sparked a bit of controversy.

A lot of people were on the news saying they weren’t happy they were going to be forced to take birth control and how it was horrible to try and stop people on the benefit from reproducing…This made me yell at the television in frustration: “It’s not mandatory! You don’t have to accept the contraceptives! If you don’t want them don’t take them!” I personally think it’s great that the option is there for them if they want it – it’s an extra cost off their back and they don’t have to worry about having kids they can’t yet afford. And if you do decide to have kids on the benefit (why would you, though?) or are against birth control for other reasons, such as health or religion, then sweet, don’t accept it, no big deal. My only issue is that it is only available to beneficiaries. Sure, they are the most in need of financial aid, but if birth control was also covered for all low-income earners (or even better, everyone!) that would be even better.

Anyway, back to Colin Craig (or Limbaugh 2.0 as I think of him). In the wake of this, here is what he had to say about it on Radio NZ: “Until we get back to the principles of personal responsibility and paying our own way, we will not stop the encroachment and continuing cost of a welfare state which we simply cannot afford even now. Why should, say, a 70-year-old who’s had one partner all their life be paying for a young woman to sleep around?”

To which I say why should a 20-year old woman pay for a 70-year-old’s pension? We’re all in this together, and we have to help each other out. If we don’t want young women having babies they can’t afford who won’t have a good life, then we need to spend money on educating them about safe sex and providing them with cheap contraceptives.

However it was his other comment that pissed me off: “We are faced with a reality that the constant changing of partners is a decision young women are making. It’s a destructive decision on a lot of levels.”

Why does he only mention women?! If young New Zealand women are having a lot of sexual partners… then who must those partners be? Men. Yet there is no mention of the slutty men, only the women and once again, no mention of contraceptives being used for health purposes outside birth control. It’s a double standard pure and simple. Besides, the amount of partners a young woman has is irrelevant because she will use the same amount of birth control as a married woman.

Here’s to hoping we aren’t going to end up like America.

Poem: It Isn’t Our Time Yet

Tags

, ,

The first will be perfect.
Small hands, big lashes
Connect-the-dots freckles up one arm
A dry laugh like a hangover
And a love of puns.

The first will be the first.
You shyly admit things
In cars
She blushes
You stare and stare and feel lucky.

She’s the first to come to family tea
Pat your cat
Laugh at your dad’s jokes
Roll her eyes at your brother’s,
Always smiling and smiling.

You feel like making things
Building and creating
And showing her places.
She can’t leave you. She just can’t.
You’ll break.

But she has to go away.
You can’t come with her, she says,
You can’t change your life for her.
Plus you’re young.
Maybe you’ll be together again someday.

You cling to that.
She stops saying it back.
You say it too much,
She says, love her too much.
The words lose their meaning.

But you can’t not tell her.
Even when she finds someone new
You can’t not tell her.
You’re so incredibly certain
That you feel it more than he does.

Then you’ll fight.
How can she be so indifferent?
How can she switch off all feeling
Like turning off a tap?
How can she parade him in your face?

And then comes the silence
And it surprises you how okay it is,
How okay you are.
Other girls come sharply into focus
As though out from under a fog.

And then you meet the second.
Brown hair, brown eyes.
In a lecture: Please sit by me.
She sits: Please talk to me.
Suddenly you’re going out for coffee.

You don’t even like coffee.
Neither does she
Your favourite film is hers
The revelation! She is just like you.
In every single way.

She has what your ex didn’t.
She gets you. She understands you.
She laughs at all your jokes.
Without trying, you’re best friends
Who touch too often.

Then she turns up at 3am
Drunk and crying
About the boy she loves
Who’s stopped saying it back.
She knew you’d be there for her.

You hold her in the hallway
People look.
You take the couch.
All she leaves is mascara smudges
On your pillow case.

She drinks a lot and cries a lot.
And she always comes to you.
You hold her and she’s shaking
And you’ll do anything to fix things
Because you know this feeling.

She comes to you, doesn’t she?
She doesn’t go to him.
She said he doesn’t like what you like
She doesn’t connect with him like with you.
You’re so close, so close.

You’re sitting in someone’s driveway
At midnight, beers in hands
Her back against your chest
You kiss her head, her neck
She turns her mouth to yours.

But after you sleep with her
She’s so still, so sad. She’s leaving.
She’s saying she can’t do this to him.
You call her and say you love her
Then quickly take it back.
You’re best friends again.
You assure her you’re over her.
But you drink too much, say too much
And she avoids you for a week.
Then repeat.

She turns up at 3am drunk and crying
More and more often
Her breakup with him…
The new guy she wants…
You feel used, you’re sick of being The Friend.

And then you meet girl three.
Blonde and sarcastic
With a birthmark on her wrist.
A dancer, a painter,
She doesn’t need you, but likes you.

This continues to surprise you.
She’s so smart, so funny.
She’s busy, but she fits you in.
Her friends love you
Her parents love you.

You’re the perfect couple.
And it’s so easy.
You introduce her to bands
She introduces you to books
You’re sharing everything.

You’re debating politics
You never cared about politics before.
You’re arranging elaborate dates for each other
You’re rewriting Shakespeare for comic effect.
She’s imitating your lecturer for comic effect.

You’re living together.
She’s moving around the furniture
And yelling at you for beautifully normal things
You’re debating the news
You never cared about the news before.

Four years pass and she’s unhappy.
You love your job, she hates hers.
You love your friends, she hates hers.
She feels like something is missing.
She resents you. You’re trying.

She’s snapping at you more than smiling.
You rewrite Shakespeare for comic effect;
She tells you to grow up.
You feel like you have grown up, with her.
How can you be happy like this? She says.

She doesn’t dance any more, paint any more.
She feels stuck and she blames you.
She shouldn’t blame you but she does.
She wants to see the world.
She doesn’t want you to come.

Just like that she’s gone.
You feel hollow and call and call and call.
She doesn’t answer.
Stop being the good guy, your friend says.
Stop being a pussy and go out there and get some.

You drink whisky and like a potion it changes you.
You’re suave, you’re sexy, you’re a man goddammit
And you’ll have your women.
Many women
Whose names you won’t remember.

Girl three’s friend becomes girl four.
Tall, plain, with hips and boobs
And a twinkle in her eye you never noticed.
She loves red lipstick
And hates reading.

She says she was always jealous.
She used to try to get you alone
Accidentally bump into you
Touch your hand
She’s so hugely attracted to you.

How did you not notice?
I can’t do this, you lie.
I’m not ready for a relationship.
And what if she found out?
Of course I want you, but…

I don’t want anything serious, she says.
We don’t have to tell her, she says.
Nobody needs to know.
She’s just always wanted to know,
Always found you sexy.

It’s like you’re another person.
You try everything.
You thought you’d known, but now…
You feign that you’re busy after.
Places to go, work to do.

You find her addictive.
You can’t go long without seeing her.
But she’s much too happy when you call.
Much too satisfied when you talk after
Or you laugh at her jokes.

She’s not the only one.
You want to make sure she knows.
When you sleep with redhead
Or skinny or big tits,
You tell her.

It’s okay, she says.
I knew what this was.
I like you, but I knew what this was.
Good, you think. Good.
But you find it hard to be the bastard.

You like her a little, of course you do.
Sometimes when you text her it’s not about sex.
Sometimes you watch a DVD together.
But you can’t picture your future with her in it.
You don’t want her and her only.

She’s getting sad now.
She admits she likes you, really likes you.
I like you too, you say, but –
I know, she says. She starts to cry.
We don’t have to do this, you say.

No, no, I’m fine, she says.
You’re not sure why she keeps sleeping with you.
You can’t tell if she’s lying
When she says she only likes you a little now.
She likes what you have too much to stop.

But now she’s making demands.
See me more often.
Sleep with me more often.
Why don’t you have time for me?
Fit me in. This isn’t working for me.

It’s all too exhausting.
You decide to be by yourself for a bit.
You don’t like the asshole she thinks you are.
You don’t like sleeping with girls you don’t like.
You don’t like how humourless you’ve become.

Five years pass uneventfully.
A few dates, a few one night stands.
A lot of time with friends,
A lot of time at work.
You have projects. You feel satisfied.
You’ve never been happier.

And that’s when I become girl five.
We’re friends, good friends.
But it’s time. I’ve known it would be time.
You didn’t know.
You’re confused.

But I liked you so long ago,
I thought you knew, you say.
You must have known, you say.
You had your chance then, why now?
Why did you wait?

Because you were so young, I say.
So inexperienced. It felt unbalanced.
I felt like I had lived so much, so young.
It was just the way it was.
You were so new, I couldn’t ruin you.

I couldn’t teach you what the others could.
I didn’t want to be the one to make you who you are.
If we had been together then,
It would have been me leaving.
I needed them to be the leavers.

I needed you to see what was out there.
Decide what you like, what you don’t.
I didn’t want you to settle for me.
I didn’t want you to feel like I’ve settled for you.
I needed you to live life, and then come home to me.

And now we just fit.
I laugh at your jokes
We plan simple dates
Debate religion
Argue over beautifully simple things.

You come to my family tea
Laugh at my brother’s jokes
Pat my dog.
My friends love you.
Your family loves me.

You find my birthmark.
We openly admit things.
And stare and grin.
You make up songs for comic effect.
I dance around the kitchen for comic effect

We build things, make things
I show you my old houses
You show me the park you played in
We try out new restaurants
Or cook for each other.

We’re as carefree as children
And silly and laughing.
But it doesn’t stop.
I don’t get sick of you.
You don’t get sick of me.

We see the world together.
Then come back
And love our jobs
And love our friends.
And love each other.

I’m glad you waited, you say.
I’m glad we waited.
Because it wasn’t our time yet.
But now we have so much time.
We have days, and days and days.

 

Two and a Half Men… and Women

Tags

, ,

On a recent episode of the Ashton Kutcher version of Two and a Half Men, Alan’s girlfriend Lyndsey said something that made me a bit uncomfortable. I’ll paraphrase because I couldn’t bring myself to re-watch that laugh track ridden stereotype pen. Also let’s just start by saying that I’m aware it’s a comedy (and not a great one at that) but it doesn’t mean it escapes critique as people are influenced by the things they watch.

Lyndsey basically explained that she had ditched her most recent, young, attractive boyfriend to get back with Alan because he “has lower standards”. She goes on to explain how she always had to walk backwards away from her ex so he wouldn’t see her bum, how she’d have to wake up in the middle of the night to put makeup on and hold it in when she needed to poo of fart because she couldn’t do it around him. She felt happier around Alan because she didn’t have to pretend she’s some sort of robot who doesn’t have a normal body that does things, and he accepted her just the way she is.

But she didn’t say that. What she did say is that he “can’t do better”.

What bugs me is that in her opinion a “better” woman than herself, one that Alan is not good enough to get, would be a woman who is younger, hotter, doesn’t fart, doesn’t poo, and wakes up looking amazing. Instead of valuing Alan for not being superficial, she settles for him because he doesn’t have the luxury of being superficial. Had he been richer, more handsome, more charming, then maybe he too could “do better” and have the girl who hides her bodily functions as Walden’s girlfriend Zoe does (she uses the guest bedroom ensuite so Walden doesn’t hear her doing what humans do every day). Alan is later shown looking uncomfortable when Lyndsey passes wind, showing that even he too feels that he has accepted that this is what he must “put up with” because he can’t do better. What fails to be highlighted is that the level of comfort Lyndsey shares with Alan makes it possibly the most normal and healthy relationship on the show.

Men everywhere need to stop putting women on pedestals and expecting completely different things of them than they do of their male friends. If you’ve ever spent even a small amount of time on male-dominated forums such as Reddit, you will no doubt have read comments along the lines of “You cannot convince me that women poop! I refuse to believe it!” One picture that made the front page was a picture focusing on the “nice” ass of a girl, with the words “she poops from there” on it; a reminder that “ruins” the image for guys ogling it. Sure, a lot of it is in jest, but it can translate to real life too.

I have an ex-boyfriend who told me he is really put off by a girl farting or hearing them in the bathroom. This obviously made me highly self-conscious whenever I stayed over and way more embarrassed than I should have if, god forbid, I let one slip accidentally. Sure, the polite thing for both genders is to try and time it so that you’re not doing it around other people (for their noses’ sake!) but it’s not healthy to have such a strong aversion to it happening and particularly not to have different expectations of women than men.

Shows like this don’t do anything to make women feel less self-conscious. Walden is considered the more appealing boyfriend on the show. He’s rich, handsome, and gets hot girls. Alan is the nerdy, awkward mooch who women are constantly disappointed in. Even Alan’s ex-wife cheats on her husband with Walden. Lyndsey also flirts with him. Being with Alan is not seen as an ideal situation for any woman to be in. The whole humour of Alan’s character is derived from him getting a bad deal all the time because he can’t do better. And yet this guy who “can’t do better” is the most tolerant and accepting of imagined faults in women. I’m happy the show brought to light the ridiculousness of women’s anxieties about their bodily functions, but wish they could have taken it further. It’s not only ludicrous for women to try and hide who they are and what they do, but it’d ridiculous that a man who likes them the way they are, farts and all, is seen as less of a catch, and a woman that does hide her true self is seen as a better one.

Why Buy the Cow if You Can Get the Milk for Free?

Tags

, , , , , ,

 

While discussing with a friend where I thought my most recent encounter with a cute male might go, she offered some well-meaning advice:

“Don’t seem too easy.”

At first glance this seems like pretty standard advice, but when I started thinking about why this is the case, things became complicated.

Why are you more worthy of the “girlfriend” title if you have better self-control and will put a stop to sexual activity – even if you want it?

You’re attracted to a guy, you’ve been hanging out and getting to know each other and talking for hours over drinks. He’s funny and interesting and you feel comfortable with him instantly. Flirtation is natural. You say your goodbyes and meet up again a couple of nights later to hang out again. You end up kissing and the sexual chemistry is instant. It’s obvious you both want to go further…

So why not?

My friend said, “My understanding is most guys won’t put in the effort for a relationship if they already get the sex for nada”.

I’m sure you’ve heard an equivalent. “Why buy the cow if you can get the milk for free?” is my least favourite example of this.

Comparing a woman to a cow aside, this is problematic for several reasons.

Firstly, why do many people still tie a woman’s worth to what she does sexually? A woman is so much more than her body parts and whether she does, or doesn’t have sex. Are there really guys out there who will ignore all the other attributes a woman has if she doesn’t ignore their advances and push them away or if she makes sexual advances herself? To a lot of guys it seems it doesn’t matter if the girl is intelligent, funny, interesting, kind, attractive and compatible with them – if she “gives it up” too soon, she’s no longer girlfriend material. That makes me pretty sad.

What’s the logic behind that? “She’s really difficult to have sex with. She keeps saying no. Man I want to date her!” What? Maybe they are living under some kind of misguided idea that all women who are open about wanting sex have low self-worth or self-esteem. Maybe they just like a challenge. Personally I’d rather not have a guy seeing me and my vagina as a challenge to overcome rather than as, you know, a person.

So women face a decision every time they want to pursue a relationship. To ignore the feelings of lust and hope it works out in our favour, or to just go for it and hope the guy won’t think less of us.

Some people may see holding out as a way to weed out the guys that they aren’t interested in dating. If a guy won’t wait to sleep with you, or loses interest if you don’t sleep with him soon enough, then why would you want to be with that guy?

Okay, fair enough logic, but then how long do you wait? And if you do wait, how do you know a guy isn’t just getting in a relationship with you in order to get sex?

So what’s a relationship seeking girl to do?

I want a guy who will look past my decision to *gasp* have sex with him as soon as we both want it and will still want to get to know me further. I want a guy who doesn’t believe a woman is any less worth knowing if she’s “easy”. More to the point, I want a guy who doesn’t include the words “easy” or “slut” in his vocabulary at all. I want a guy who doesn’t care how many people I’ve had sex with because he knows as long as it was safe and consensual it doesn’t affect who I am as a person.

But ultimately, I am not afraid of casual sex. I have no problem with it. If I sleep with a guy and it doesn’t go further than that, I’m okay with that. But everyone needs to make the decision for themselves. If you really like a guy and it would bother you if you slept with him and it turned out he just wanted sex, sure, don’t sleep with him. Get to know him a little better and find out what he’s looking for and if he’s interested in you. He just wants something casual? No biggie, back off. But if, like me, you feel part of the discovery of how you work together is sex, that’s okay too. If it leads to a relationship that’s great, but if it doesn’t, no harm done and you had some fun with a (hopefully) sexy, attentive man.

I’m not saying having sex with every guy you’re interested in is the way to go, or that holding out is wrong. Nor am I against anyone who chooses only to have casual sex, not relationships. Everyone likes different things and that’s fine. What I don’t agree with are the people who think holding out on sex makes you more dateable; that if we want sex too soon then we lose value as women and as potential girlfriends; that even if we really want sex with a guy, we should say no if we want to be taken seriously or respected; that if we “give in” we could risk being put in the “only good for sex” basket, and alternatively if we wait that we may end up in relationships with people who are only committing for the sex.

This has been more questions than answers so I’ll just encourage you to ask all the men in your life what they think. Get a conversation started. I’m sure that most if not all of them won’t be the kind of guys who won’t date a girl if she’s “easy”, but if you come across one who does, ask them why. Are they acting on old ingrained notions that women are supposed to be chaste? Have they ever gotten into a relationship just because they wanted sex? Let me know what they say.

For the record, a lot of guys I asked about this said that they worry an easy girl is more likely to cheat because if she is willing to follow attraction so quickly without holding back, who’s to say she won’t hold back when she’s dating you but meets someone new she finds attractive?

All I can say in reply to this is that in my experience this isn’t true and it sounds like paranoia. It’s pretty shitty to lump women into baskets and assume all women who do a) will also do b) and that if a woman has a lot of casual sex she’s not going to be faithful in a relationship. That, in my opinion, is still borderline slut-shaming. That’s like saying “If she’s capable of having a one night stand then she’ll probably keep having one night stands while she’s dating me”. No, that’s not how people work. We go through different stages in our lives and often follow completely different patterns from one another. Some people will go through periods in their life where they have no interest in love or relationships but still want some sexual satisfaction, but then later end up in successful long term relationships when the time is right. Others get out of a long term relationship and just want something casual for a change. And others sleep with someone before it develops from something casual to a relationship.

I wonder if the guy who won’t date easy girls has ever had a one night stand himself. If he has, he met a stranger, took them home, and had casual sex with them. He didn’t hold back. So he himself, at that point in time, was easy. Does this mean that he himself would not be loyal in a relationship? Of course not. You cannot just decide that the two correlate.

Perhaps I’m just being optimistic when I say that I hope most people who read this won’t know what I’m talking about because the concept is foreign to them and they judge people on their merit as a person not on their sexual activity, but it still seems like I’m hearing this shit all the time. Why buy the cow when you can get the milk for free? Because women aren’t a commodity, and by the way, you sound fucking stupid.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.